Displays Archived Posts


A plotz of greasy black dust

a partially ground-out wing

Or, if its too late,

(for you, certainly) (but for me, also)

irradiating droplets of blood

like pollack gone mad

It didn’t have to be this way

This enervating tango of buzzing and near misses.

We could have been friends.

Well, if not friends,

Acquaintances, then.

Acquaintances who share a love of the trees

slagging sideways with their mantle of leaves,

weather of the warmer persuasion,

and long days that reluctantly handshake with night.

It didn’t have to be this way.

But you,

you,

you always go for blood.

I

heart

Adam

Lambert

NOTE: The byline to the contrary, this post was jointly written by both K and Nerdmeyr.

NOTE 2: This will probably be a long post with enormous amounts of painful details. So, grab a tea or mug of beer.

Last night, K and I accompanied our friends M. Valliant and Julia to Dinky’s Amish Auction House in Daviess County, about a forty-five minute drive from our town. M.V. and Julia offered to take us after their first visit when they came back with 75 cabbage plants ($10) and an old-school drinking fountain ($1).

amishauction_1Perhaps it was the overly long winter, perhaps it was K’s and my relative sequestering of ourselves in our house over the overly long winter, perhaps it was the first day of sticky hot weather, but I (Nerdmeyr) was overwhelmed upon arrival. And I don’t mean arrival inside the auctioning areas, but rather our arrival in the parking lot. We, in a station wagon, were dwarfed by the hundreds of giant full-size pickups in the packed parking lot.

Oh, and back up for a second. Part of the reason I was overwhelmed by the parking lot and trying to find a space in it is that we had picked up a passenger along the way. Not knowing the exact way to Dinky’s, we had stopped at a gas station and Julia asked a person, John W., who looked as though he (by way of dress) might know the way.  A ride for him and directions for us worked out for everyone!  And, after passing time amicably conversing the way that strangers converse, we were at Dinky’s.

[[MAJOR ASIDE NUMBER 1: When I say that we all conversed in the way that strangers do, I mean that we discussed where we all live, where we come from, and what we do, assuming (at least it seemed to me) that we would have little in common or that we expected to have to explain ourselves to one another, so best not to go into too much detail. This didn't really turn out to be the case. M.V. and Julia discussed their respective fields of study, which led us to the topic of hormones in meat. All of us agreed: hormones = bad, but none of us could say for sure why. In the nanosecond after I (Nerdmeyr) realized how surprised I was by this point of commonality, amishauction_5I was struck by how stupid was my assumption. Our passenger lives in a rural area and is probably faaaaar more up to speed on the evils of modern agriculture than I, hippie city dweller, will probably ever be. Either way, that point of commonality was less surprising than finding out that we all buy meat at grocery stores. My surprise probably is due the fact that my knowledge of the Amish is limited to Witness, produce purchases at the farmer's market,  and a family-style restaurant in Shipshewana.  [[[[END MAJOR ASIDE NUMBER 1]]]]]

Parking lot: Where I’m suddenly uncomfortably aware of how much space all the trucks (I’m assuming owned by the English) take up compared to the horse-n-buggies off on the perimeters of the parking lot. Why do the trucks get the middle area?  Why are the horse-n-buggies  – at an AMISH auction – shoved off to the side?  It’s as if at a gay bar, the gay people must be off to the side in order to make room for the bachelorette parties.

Once inside, you must first go to the central accounts counter. The central accounts counter is manned by both Amish and English; while the division of labor is unclear, it did seem like maybe only the English use the computers. To get a bidding number, you provide some form of ID. You only have to do this once and Julia had already done so the last time she came, so we got two bidding cards on her account. Then, once the bidding card complete with 3-digit number in 100 pt font is procured, you wander the various auctions.

But to say that “you wander the various auctions” doesn’t quite capture the experience. The whole enterprise is impressively vast in scale, and yet remarkably sparse in infrastructure.  A good way of describing it (via nerd-terms) might be a co-located array of giant tin-roofed buildings. And also interstitial open areas where large pallets of building products like corrugated tin and lumber and also decrepit cars – hoods opened up like women in the Amsterdam red-light district - were being sold. We would witness several hundred thousand dollars worth of stuff sell over the course of the evening; everything from a dollar’s worth-box of fake flower arrangements tossed in with a Polaroid camera to a $650 Angus steer.  Mysterious, amazing, wonderful stuff of worth sometimes understandable and other times unclear all sold by men (yeah, we mean that pronoun literally) who have the gift of unintelligible gab that is the hallmark of all amazing auction sellers:

{trying to sell a mysterious Rube Goldberg machine labeled “Lollipop” which featured clear plastic walls to better see the interior guts involving plastic gears, ramps,  and some sort of american coin acceptor that last saw daylight in a trucker’s gas station on a major interstate}:
“LOLLIPOPP MACHINE! WOW! LOLLIPOP MACHINE! LOOKIT THIS LOLLIPOP MACHINE! gitcherlollipop fivefivefivefivercanwehearafivefivervfiverfivefourfity
fityfityfourfityfityfourfourfourfourYEP!fourtwentyfiveYEP!fourfityfityfityYEP!fourseventyfive fourseventyfive fourseventy five DO I HEAR A four seventyfive five fivefiverfiveityfive five five doihear another fiveity fourseventyfiverty five fivety GOING GOING SOLD!”

[[MAJOR ASIDE NUMBER 2: On the ride home, someone suggested that Lotus World Music Festival procure an auctioneer to perform, as the more awesome auctioneers definitely incorporated melodic intonations to their auctioneering, often turning the timbre of their voice down or up at the end of statements.  I (Nerdmeyr) thought that the better auctioneers shared many characteristics with Tuvan throat singers, but maybe amishauction_2that's just me. K thought that maybe the up/down intonations were to help the auctioneers remember at what price point they were at, as I'm sure by the end of the evening one bin full of socket wrenches might blend into another. I (K) also think that the rhythm helps let you know how long you've got to make any additional bid, like a clock counting down. I've no doubt both auctioneers and buyers use that time to control the direction of the sale, but how one might go about doing so completely escaped me. [[[[End of Major Aside #2]]]]

At any rate, the auctions take place in huge rooms filled with everything from live stock to antique cabinets to hanging plants to manually-operated butter churns and Budweiser mirrors (the latter of which was, surprisingly, not such a hot commodity with the Amish). These wildly varied items emptied out of the building by the end of the night under minimal oversight. And by “minimal oversight”, we mean, “none at all”. As soon as you win an auction, you can grab up your parcel of schtuff and take it out to your vehicle before the thunderstorm that’s threatening Vigo County gets to Daviess County. Everything large and furniture-like is marked with a numbered piece of masking tape representing the seller’s ID; we never saw how they marked the smaller animals like rabbits and guinea hens, much less the horses, cars, and old-school electric generators.

amishauction_3

As I said, the infrastructure is simple; the overwhelming aspect to it is the scale of the event: at least six auctions going simultaneously, some in the same room and the sheer volume of stuff for sale is what really impresses. More overwhelming than the parking lot was figuring out how to jump into the bidding. It was like an enormous, multi-tiered, sped-up game of double dutch that never stopped. There was no telling (at least on our end) what items would be hotly contested, or by whom. And the vernacular of bidding was intimidating, too. Nobody waves their hands about; rather, its all about making eye contact with the auctioneer or his helper,  and nodding “yes”.  Or making an abrupt up/down motion with the hand that’s carrying the bidding card.  Subtle head nods, esp. when there’s a bidding war going on, also seem to be acceptable.  (M.V. warned us against superfluous motion before we went in for this reason.)  Also interesting was the sad, ashamed “no” head-shake by a bidder when the bidding had gone past their top price point – as if the auctioneer was asking “Have you not killed multiple people in acts of rage?”, and then the person has to hang their head, downcast their eyes, and then shake their head, “no. no, i _have_ killed multiple people in acts of rage, and thus I do not deserve the vintage child’s hobby horse currently being auctioned for $12.75.”

amishauction_4

In some cases, you could communicate your interest in particular items and thereby steer which things were auctioned at what time. In most cases, though, there were just clusters of people hovered around waiting for the auctioneer to make his way to an item. You could also figure out which stuff you were interested in and estimate how long it would take for the auctioneer to make his way over to that item, and then wander to another room and bid on something else and come back.

The fact that somehow, magically, the stuff that fills these room replicates every Friday night, begs questions like: Where does the stuff come from? Who brings their stuff here? Why are the Amish, who make their life not following English ways, peddling popcorn machines and clock radios? This auction serves a relatively finite and stable population (compared to say, oh, Ebay). For it to maintain a customer base, I would think it would have to be the only place that most folks purchased anything ever. Think about it: imagine purchasing all your groceries, household items, major appliances, and frivolous knickknacks all on one night only, once a week. But, the stuff for sale isn’t new, so it must either continuously circulate through the auction house, or perhaps people acquire it with the specific intention of auctioning it? And if this is the primary, or exclusive, shopping site for most people, then is it really a deal for the buyer? The only sense you would have of an item’s market value would develop in the 30 seconds it takes to auction it off. This would be economical only if the auction was truly an isolated economy unto itself.

The more pressing questions is: How exactly did Mountain Dew secure its monopoly on the Amish market? We’re thinking it probably wasn’t the ads featuring extreme snow boarding. We have never seen so much Mountain Dew consumed in a single space, ever. Everyone – man, woman, child, silver marten jersey wooly rabbit – seemed to be sucking down a 20 oz. of Mountain Dew. In general, there was a remarkable amount of junk food available.  Not necessarily crappy-shitty-but-oh-so-tasty-state-fair-food either; we’re talking giant bins of potato chips and melting candy bars sold 5/$1.00.  And there’s something not right when at 11pm, herds of kids running are about and screaming at the tops of their lungs [what Nerdmeyr means to say here is: "I was not allowed to run wild on sugar highs at 11 pm and I wasn't even raised in a strict religious community...what gives?"].  Having said this, Nerdmeyr certainly enjoyed a chicken finger (with mustard and BBQ sauce) as well as a chocolate soft-serve sundae so splendiforously provided, it spilled over the sides of the styrofoam cup [all of which tasted particularly good due to my strict "unstrict" upbringing].

When you’re ready to leave with whatever you’ve won, you settle your account back at the central desk. Besides the bidding price, there’s a 7% bidding tax (to help pay for the auctioneers and the space), and the state sales tax.

So, what did we come away with? A seriously sturdy, well-made clothes drying rack. That we got into a bidding war with M.V. over. For $17.50. M.V. and Julia made much more efficient use of the auction, bringing home 5 boxes of Mason jars, a pitchfork, a giant stoneware crock, and 2 former xmas lawn decorations that will be repurposed for a pea trellis.

A Note on the pictures: All procured from Google, as I (Nerdmeyr) thought about bringing some sort of recording device but then decided against it in the name of Not Being A Touristic Asshole For Whom Poore Country People Are Just a Good Blog Poste.  A good decision, as far as I’m concerned. I’m sure Dinky’s gets its fair share of summer tourists, but I definitely felt in the distinct minority of outsiders. I felt like I had travelled to another country but then felt like an asshole for feeling so (”Are Not These But My Country Brethren In This Time Of Economic Depression”)… then felt slightly less atavistic when M.V. also said that he felt he went into “world traveller mode” when he was there. I (Nerdmeyr) commented early on that the place seemed ripe for some sort of community activism, as the people there seemed of a common cloth, Amish and English alike – of rural experience, of rural living, of common challenge to make a living without being poisoned by hormones or pesticides, and (biggest point of commonality): not on anyone’s minds, not, it would seem, the current presidential administration. yet, who would do that work? To what ends?

My folks have been sending me news about a recent “scandal” in portland over the fact that mayor sam adams once had sex with an 18 yr old and when asked about it during his campaign, said that he didn’t. My mom pretty much summed up the whole uproar in one word: dumb.

But I’d like to go ahead anyway and use it as an opportunity to sputter about how much I disagree with middle of the road gay people who believe that we’re “just like straight people only we have same sex partners,” sport bumper stickers that read “support diversity,” and are calling for adams’ resignation.

What is so glorious about having a gay mayor if they must conduct themselves in accord with the stupid drooling sexual mores of heteronormativity? It seems to me that the benefit of a gay mayor is not having to agonize over whether they cheated on their spouse, or care if they had sex with Another-Person-Who-Could-Be-Charged-With-A-Sex-Crime-If-They-Ever-Had-Sex-With-A-Minor (i.e., adult).

Why even have diversity among our elected officials, or even at all, if it doesn’t make anything different?

To Sam: If you resign, then you’re just another mayor who happened to be gay. Please please please do NOT resign for the very reason that you are a gay mayor.

Two videos my late night, conspiracy-riddled brain thought you all might find interesting:

1) Ralph Nader addressing a question about the proposed $700B financial bail out. Through slurred words and fidgeting, Ralph manages to convey that he’s read the three-page proposed plan issued by the Treasury Department, which contains language that prohibits any oversight of how federal funds will be used.

He then launches into a hyperbole-driven, (”folksy,” even) analysis of how socialism always saves capitalism, which secures him coverage on www.latenightwithnerdmeyr&kinAmerikkka.com

2) Paul Krugman, professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton, discussing the same three-page document [Note: fast forward to 47:00 for the good stuff, or 45:00 if you also want an explanation of the problem].

The first question you’ll ask yourself after watching this is: Does Ralph Nader even know that Powerpoint exists? The second question you might ask is: Did anyone other than Ralph and Paul read that document?

is anyone else doing a double take on the Obama-Biden signs?

Three years ago I saw my first Bloomington 4th of July parade in 100 degree heat. The parade consisted primarily of dump trucks and sundry patriots. This morning, I walked down to the parade route in a refreshing 67 degree rain storm. It was raining so hard, I figured they would cancel. Not a chance! After an interminable prayer, two minutes of silence, the singing of the national anthem, a rendition of taps, and a ten gun salute, the parade started. All the usual suspects – Mustang convertibles (top closed, naturally), vintage Army Jeeps, the League of Women Voters, the city’s intramural football team, and Bloomington’s own Beanpole the God of Pointless Behavior, who seemed to be having a great deal of trouble this year with float mechanics. At some point, the MC said something about renewable energy sources. If you hadn’t noticed these days, nothing says green like red, white, and blue.

And then, from a block away, I saw the gold tips against the sky and the reason I’d dressed in my summer best. It might be that in my excitement to beat to the front of the crowd, I missed the MC’s introduction. Or perhaps he simply pretended not to notice the fifteen foot flaming gold float surrounded by stylish people dancing with hand-sewn fish and rainbow umbrellas. But I noticed, and so did the grandma standing next to me who asked, “Is that a Pride float?” It was a hot Technicolor beam of love in a tepid gray sea of american eagle t-shirts, and it’s a miracle I didn’t tear up because parades always make me cry, and so do happy gay people, especially when they’re wearing red cowgirl outfits. Luckily I was too busy trying to make Nerdmeyr’s camera work to be sentimental.

I also managed not to get in a fight with grandma who just had to say that she thought it was inappropriate which meant I just had to get my fur up and hiss “there’s nothing wrong with gay people” before stalking off. What an understatement! Every town should be so lucky to have such a handsome float in their 4th of July parade. Yeah big love!

The following post is something I’ve wanted to say for some time. My decision to say it now is not due to any particular event, and I am not directing it at any particular person, and I write it with all due respect.

It seems to me that the recent agitation for and against state sanctioned marriages between gay couples has obscured a valuable conversation about the function of marriage more generally. What’s more, it obscures valuable work being done by glbt/queer folk to re-invent the meaning of kinship. The reason that I do not agitate for gay marriage is because I find the legalistic and social functions of marriage to be antithetical to this queer project. In other words, I do not believe that queer culture and marriage can co-exist in some sort of mutually tolerant arrangement. I also do not believe that openminded and well-intentioned people will change the function of marriage “from the inside.” This does not mean that I think married people are nefarious, or that people who want to get married are chumps. I appreciate how difficult it is for any of us to get by in the world and get a little validation and security, and find a little meaning. My motivation for writing this is not to draw lines or to separate the men from the fags, but only to make visible a persistent tension in my life. On the one hand, I wish to support all my friends in however they choose to arrange their families. On the other, I wish to construct novel, durable, and sustainable forms of kinship, and frankly this means dismantling conventional forms.

And here maybe you’ll ask: Why does it have to be either/or? Aren’t people symbolically building all manner of family all the time? Don’t individuals decide for themselves who their family is anyway? And why do others have to be different for you to do what you want?

The problem I have with these arguments is that they grossly underestimate the influence of legal and social structures on individual behavior. Such arguments pressume those structures to be some how optional, and individual decisions to be some how independent of such influence. Most distressingly, I find that those who make these arguments often present themselves as disinvested from such structures, as if their own seemingly private, abstruse reasons for wanting to get married stand apart from the usual rationales.

It is precisely that fashioning of marriage as a personal, private decision that most bothers me. If it was private, than you would not need to announce your marriage, or have a wedding, and you most certainly would not need me to attend. The only thing private about marriage is the privilege of doing it at all, which is to say it is exclusive by its very definition and intended to grant legitimacy to some relationships at the expense of others. And the point at which a marriage is so private it’s a secret, then it no longer counts. The same is true for kinship in general: it doesn’t count if no else can see it, or if no one else recognizes it. This invisibility was the problem some queer folks hoped to address by calling for gay marriage. But I’m not interested in making gay people more like straight people; I’m interested in dismantling heteronormativity, and that means making visible, and available, alternative forms of kinship. There are myriad ways in which to make that happen, so to be clear, I’m not arguing that discrimination prevents me from creating a family. I’m saying I see people choosing conventional forms of kinship rather than making use of those other options.

So, what to do? Boycott all weddings? It would save me money, but it also means I don’t get to be a part of an important event in my friends’ lives, and that only further dispossesses me of any legitimate community ties. It seems the best thing to do is to have my say so at least I don’t just wander around the reception grumbling to myself. I will, however, take this opportunity to make the following announcement: All future wedding presents from me will be in the form of a donation to organizations working to secure legal options for gay people who wish to adopt children, retirement communities for glbt folks, and domestic partnership benefits (broadly defined).

A flap over an outsized American flag and its flagpole has city officials and an auto dealership dueling over patriotism, advertising and neighborhood peace.

The city reports receiving more than 100 e-mail messages since the City Council last week ordered Towbin Hummer to take down its 100-foot flagpole. Most disagree with the council’s decision.

Mayor Oscar Goodman blamed the dealership several miles west of the Las Vegas Strip for not keeping a promise to build a small veterans memorial with the tall pole.

from “Oversized American flag causes flap in Las Vegas

Riding through the city on my bike all day
Cause the filth took away my license
It doesn’t get me down and I feel OK
Cause the sights that I’m seeing are priceless

Everything seems to look as it should
But I wonder what goes on behind doors
A fella looking dapper, but he’s sitting with a slapper
Then I see it’s a pimp and his crack whore

When you look with your eyes
Everything seems nice
But if you look twice
you can see it’s all lies
from Lilly Allen’s song “LDN”
Click the play button to the left to listen to a sample from “LDN” from LastFM (may take a moment to load)

Lest you’re one of those folks who thinks the world has been completely taken over by cynical, ironic people, please note that there is no mention whatsoever in the above-referenced article about the COMPLETE RIDICULOUSNESS of a freaking HUMMER DEALERSHIP making any sort of legitimate claim to love the veterans or the U.S. or anything, for that matter, other than their evident love of being the transportation equivalent of a nasty, crotch-scratching crack dealer peddling giginormous crack pipes to a nation of strung-out crack addicts, the better with which to smoke more crack! (Do I need to say again the oft-quoted stat that your average 2006 Hummer gets about 15 mpg, while the 1908 Model T got about 25 mpg??? This is progress????!?!)

If you really feel patriotic, Hummer dealerships, how about getting real and making your danged egocentric-urban-crusher-mobiles run on human blood? Instead of shipping military people all the way over the Iraq and Afghanistan to get blown to bits ensuring the flow of oil into our car-veins doesn’t slow, we could just keep them here, in camps, and hook them up to IVs. Vertical integration and cutting out the middle-man, isn’t that what smart business is all about Hummer?

Soylent green is people, people, and so is our addiction to oil.

PS. As Mike says, “I don’t have the time or energy to try to turn this into some kind of “See!? That’s what’s wrong with Vegas!” thing, because that’s not what’s wrong with Vegas.” Indeed, I would add, Vegas is the bravely pointed weeping-opening-above-the-skin of our society’s grand seething carbuncle, and its genius is that it knows its very existence is dependent on gawkers flocking to see the pus come out in real-time…. in the form of lush green lawns replacing the desert, huge Hummer dealerships, plasterboard re-creations of famously old european cities slated to be demolished in ten years….

I’ve been reading a biography of psychologist Harry Harlow, the man who (as his hyperbole-prone biographer put it) proved to the hard-hearted men of his field that love really does make the world go round. The book, Love at Goon Park, is an extremely fascinating history of primate studies, and of academic culture. The author, Deborah Blum, too often confuses her own cultural values for common sense (thus suggesting, for instance, that there is no substitute for a mother’s love), but she nevertheless delivers an excellent narrative that does not try to resolve the many contradictions Harlow lived.

In more ways than one, this book has made me wonder about how societies 1) create truisms for themselves, then 2) overturn those truisms for some reason or another, and 3) eventually re-subscribe to that truism, but for entirely different reasons thus, arguably, making it an altogether different truism. The particular example I’ve been pondering is that of spouses as co-workers. Harlow’s first wife was an academically talented psychology student who dropped out of school due to the then university rule against the hiring of spouses (she would have been unable to be hired by the University of Wisconsin where Harlow worked, nor would they have been able to work together at any university thus making it impossible for them to live in the same place). His second wife was an established researcher at Wisconsin who also left her position at the university for the same reason. It seems this anti-spousal hiring policy was once a common practice as there was a married couple portrayed in the movie Good Night, and Good Luck who both worked for CBS and who hid their marriage due to a similiar policy.

I’ve no doubt this policy was eventually challenged by feminists on the grounds that it adversely effected the careers of women more often then of men, as was true for both Harlow’s first and second wives. What I don’t know is why the policy was adopted in the first place. It may have been little more than a means of discriminating against married women, but I would like to know the official rationale for the rule. The reason I’m curious is that most universities today practice “spousal hires” as a means of retaining desirable faculty members. The university will either create a new position for the spouse, sometimes in the same department or in another department, or else encourage the department to consider that person in addition to other job candidates (essentially floating the spouse’s application to the top of the pile). This practice has become so commonplace and _expected_ that some married couples now go on the job market as a team (I have even seen a joint CV submitted). In addition to being a sort of perk for desirable professors, the spousal hire increasingly is seen as good management: a means of keeping faculty happy who would otherwise find it difficult to get jobs in the same city, and thus would have to bi-locate indefinitely. This policy is not some rarely envoked obscure rule; there are five professors (not counting their spouses) in my department alone who have benefited from spousal hires. I dare say you now have a better chance of securing the ever precious tenure-track job if you are married than if you’re single.

I find the spousal-hire policy nauseating, especially in the context of so much hostility toward affirmative action. It is very strange to me that universities won’t hire their own graduates, but they’ll hire two married professors who in many cases graduated from the same program and often have the same research interests. It wouldn’t surprise me at all to find that the policy encourages people to date their classmates, thus making those who are already cloistered only further myopic in vision. Monkey love indeed (where validating a person’s every life decision is mistaken for true love). And even if universities extend this policy to same-sex couples, and I don’t know that they do, there remains the problem of rewarding only certain kinds of relationships. Why draw the line at a spouse? Why wouldn’t the university consider hiring my bestfriend whom I’ve been through grad school with, published with, and who understands my research better than anyone? I guess only certain kinds of love make some people’s world go round.

At any rate, I wonder what the original rationale was against hiring spouses because I find myself approving of that old-fashioned, out-dated policy, and wondering if the feminist challenge to it would even still be pertinent to the argument.

Next Page »